Live Workshop – Understanding Parabolic Lighting

In this information packed live photography workshop Karl sheds some light on the mystery surrounding parabolic reflectors.

These versatile modifiers are a go-to for fashion and beauty work as they produce beautiful sparkly light that is very flattering when it comes to skin tone and able to reveal great detail in different textures.

Here Karl explains exactly what makes these modifiers so special and why the Para 133 is his modifier of choice. Touching on the physics of lighting and the science behind the parabolic shape, Karl demonstrates the effect of these modifiers, their versatility, as well as a few other, more affordable alternative modifiers.

In this live photography workshop we cover the following:

  • The science behind what makes a true parabolic reflector
  • When, where and why to use parabolic reflectors (and when not to)
  • The different parabolic reflectors and the results
  • Modifying parabolic reflectors
  • Parabolic reflectors live demonstration — beauty and product shoots
  • Lighting modifier comparisons
  • Affordable alternative lighting modifiers
  • Advantages and disadvantages of different lighting modifiers

To read more about parabolic modifiers, the science behind them and their uses, read our blog post here.

If you have any question about this photography workshop, use the comments box below.


  1. Hello Karl,

    I have the opportunity to buy this Saturday a second hand Para 222. The seller proposes also for a very good price a Broncolor ringflash. Is it useful to use the ringflash in the Para222 ? I have an old powerpack a Pulso4 (3200j) and 3200j Pulso heads. Is it better to use the Pulso heads ? Is there a difference in the light ? Of course the Ringflash can be used in other situations as well…

    Kind ragards from Brussels

    1. Hi Michel, the old para 222 uses the ringflash so it’s not quite the same as the new para 222 which you can mount a standard light inside. Personally I’d say the new one with the pulso heads is slightly better but as you say the ringflash can be a useful tool in other situations, especially as a shadow fill light.

  2. Hi Karl,
    Thanks for the show, clarified all concepts with parabolic shaped lighting.

    One query I have, during the course you mentioned about tutorial/class named as ‘beauty lighting comparison’ under equipment drop down.
    I am not able to locate the EQUIPMENT header, could you please guide.

    Also additionally, if it is possible to share any KTE website architecture – it will be easy to navigate through and locating or re-searching particular content will be easier.
    As this website is huge pool of information and inspiration, and always like to come back to see new content or repeat earlier class.

    Thanks once again.
    – Sanket

  3. Hi Karl, is there a comparison coming soon with the Satellite Staro? I saw a capture during the Para 133/222 comparisons that was labeled Staro. I ask because I am interested in both modifiers but can only invest in one that needs to serve a couple of purposes between fashion and product.

  4. Hi Karl,
    thanks for the show, like it very much!!
    One point you mentioned, that in order for the para to work efficiently the light source should not be flat (speedlite for example) that is why when you use the Siros you remove the front reflector to have a round light what do you think when using the Profoto B1 or D2 they got a round flat front, I guess in this case it is better to use the Pro Heads, in addition what do you of the Profoto Giant Reflector comparing to Bron Para.

    1. Hi Ashraf, yes the front of the light must be protruding forward so that it emanates in all directions otherwise the physics wont work in a Para. With regards the Profoto as explained in the video if the shape and curvature are not right then it wont be as good as the bron.

  5. Hi Karl,

    thanks for the video. I use a Para133 and I like it because since I’m not a photographer, this light is fantastic, and with a minimum of knowledge you get very good pictures. A friend who hapened to have a Para133 and sold it, says that he prefers his 165cm deep Profoto umbrella. Easier to transport, to setup in location and a light stand is sufficient. And futhermore, he doesn’t see any major difference comparing to his umbrella !!! I also have these Profoto umbrellas and it’s true that it’s an easy solution, but I like the Para133 (cannot afford a 222), it gives me everytime very good results…

    I’ll see you in Paris in June for the workshop, I hope you’ll be as entertaining and exciting as in your videos….

    Thank you Karl


Leave a Comment